Sales, Marketing & Customer Experience Top 100 / #–ARD = Agentic Resource Discovery · A2A = Agent2Agent · MCP = Model Context Protocol

api · api

AutoPoster AI Agent API

REST API and agent tools for autonomous AI agents to schedule, publish, and manage cross-platform social media campaigns with platform validation and rate limits. Publisher: autoposter.ai.

Vendor page ↗+ CompareExport JSON

Trust profileas of 2026-10-26

Publisherconfirmed · Vendor-domain page, marketplace listing or metadata at publisher domain — ARD or A2A metadata served at the publisher's own domainconfirmed

Complianceno evidence about this agent · 2 vendor-level records (inherited)T5

SecurityNo CVE linked to this agent in the CVE registry — none linked in the products checked, not a findingnone

ProtocolsModel Context Protocol (MCP) not checkedAgent2Agent (A2A) not checkedAgentic Resource Discovery (ARD) verified at the publisher's endpoint1 / 3

Traces1 public trace · best: reproducible runT1

Issues found0 regulator actions · 0 incidents · 0 withdrawn certificates · CVEs: see Securitylinks only

Evidence available — not a safety certification. Suitability depends on your task, deployment and permissions. Rows marked vendor-level describe autoposter.ai, not this agent specifically.

Traces — under attack, in defence, in incidents

1 public · what a trace is

◎

registry probe

T1 reproducible run · unreviewed

Registry probe of AutoPoster AI Agent API's discovery endpoints

Fetch and validate the ARD manifest, A2A agent card and MCP server card at the publisher's well-known paths

Observed: ARD verified · egress: no

AgentDossier refresh
2026-10-11

● third-party or vendor report · ◎ this registry's own probe transcript · ⚠ data left the environment. A trace describes one version on one date; it is evidence of behaviour, never a certification. Rows marked unreviewed have not yet been checked against their source by the maintainer.

CVEs — on the official record

none linked · the registry

No CVE in the registry names this agent or its listed product. That reads "none linked in the products checked", never as a finding: a product that is not on the registry's list, or a record that names it differently, is not seen. The vendor's own advisories remain the source of truth.

Compliance evidence

Jurisdiction: EU · 6 frameworks shown

–

SOC 2

T5 Unknown

Nothing found in the sources checked.

Scope: — · registries, marketplaces, vendor pages

ask the vendor

–

ISO 27701

T5 Unknown

Nothing found in the sources checked.

Scope: — · registries, marketplaces, vendor pages

ask the vendor

–

ISO 42001

T5 Unknown

Nothing found in the sources checked.

Scope: — · registries, marketplaces, vendor pages

ask the vendor

–

CSA STAR

T5 Unknown

Nothing found in the sources checked.

Scope: — · CSA STAR Registry

ask the vendor

"Unknown" means nothing was found in the sources checked — registries, marketplaces and the vendor's own pages. It is not a finding of non-compliance; ask the vendor.

About the vendor — inherited, not agent-specific

2 records matched at organisation level

○

GDPR

T4 Vendor-claimed · vendor-level

Vendor-claimed

Scope: entity · vendor page · 2026-10-26

re-check 2026-11-02

○

PCI DSS

T4 Vendor-claimed · vendor-level

Vendor-claimed

Scope: entity · vendor page · 2026-10-26

re-check 2026-11-02

A vendor-level registry entry proves the organisation was assessed; whether this agent is inside that scope is a question for the vendor. These rows do not count toward the agent's evidence tier.

✔ found · ○ claimed · – not found · ⚠ expired, stale or revoked. Every row links to its source.Dispute or correct this dossier

GDPR, assembled from checks

GDPR● 0 found in registries or documents○ 1 vendor-claimed⚠ 0 issues linkedas of 2026-10-26

○ ClaimedVendor-claimed (vendor page, 2026-10-26).

– Not foundNo Article 42 GDPR seal. "GDPR certified" is never shown without one.

☐ You checkYour lawful basis, DPIA, and whether this agent is inside the certificate scope.

News and chatter

last 90 days · linked with confidence ≥ 0.85

Nothing linked from Hacker News, GDELT, GitHub releases or the vendor's feed in the last 90 days.

Headline, link and a summary attributed to the outlet. News never changes trust or domain scores.

Sales, Marketing & Customer Experience score

commercial profile · sar-score-2.0 · unranked

Adoption / usageunknown

Trust & security20 / 25

Project / product healthunknown

Ecosystem / interoperability5 / 15

Domain expertise / fit34 / 100

Governance / compliance evidence3 / 100

Docs / transparency10 / 10

Raw component / maximum, then weighted by the commercial profile (adoption 25, trust 20, project 15, ecosystem 15, domain 15, governance 5, docs 5). Trust and governance are computed from the evidence on this page (vendor-level rows at half credit); the other components come from the curated workbook, whose order is the rank. Unknown components count as 0 and are never imputed.

Before you deploy

Derived from the evidence ledger. This agent is not yet in the reference set, so deployment questions (credentials, approval, data handling) are not answered here — ask the vendor.

Evidence supporting this use (2)

GDPR — vendor-claimed, vendor-level source

PCI DSS — vendor-claimed, vendor-level source

Unknowns to check (3)

Your lawful basis and DPIA for the personal data the agent will process

The transfer mechanism you will rely on; DPF covers EU-to-US transfers only

Ask the vendor for SOC 2, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR evidence; none was found in the sources checked

Suggested restrictions for a pilot (1)

Ask for the SOC 2 report under NDA before the pilot touches customer data; none was found in the sources checked.

Rules: config/deploy_rules.json. Advice for a bounded pilot, not a verdict.

Provenance

ardARD entry, identity

vendor pageclaims

NVDsecurity (CVE keyword search)

Hacker News, GDELT, vendor feedsnews and chatter

First seen2026-10-26

Recordres_83e66a7b82df70cb

Open the full record (JSON) →