Reference implementation Data compiled from public sources as of 2026-10-26. Not an assessment, certification or recommendation. Confirm current status with the vendor and the issuing body.
AgentDossier · AI Agent Registry Find agents you can actually trust - public or inside your enterprise.
Finance & Banking Top 100 / #1ARD = Agentic Resource Discovery · A2A = Agent2Agent · MCP = Model Context Protocol
Financial-services agents · commercial · Salesforce; AWS Marketplace

Agentforce Financial Services

Purpose-built agentic financial-services platform with compliance guardrails and audit trails. Publisher: Salesforce. Also ranked in Insurance (#1), Regulatory, Risk & Compliance (#1), Legal (#16).

Vendor page ↗+ CompareExport JSON
Trust profileas of 2026-10-26
Publisherunconfirmed · Vendor name only — only the vendor name is knownunconfirmed
Compliance1 record about this agent · 1 registry-matched · +6 vendor-level (inherited)T1
Security3 CVEs linked in the registry · newest 2025-11-04linked
ProtocolsModel Context Protocol (MCP) probed, not foundAgent2Agent (A2A) probed, not foundAgentic Resource Discovery (ARD) probed, not found0 / 3
Traces1 public trace · best: vendor report · data left the environment in at least oneT3
Issues found0 regulator actions · 0 incidents · 0 withdrawn certificates · CVEs: see Securitylinks only

Publisher unconfirmed: the evidence below is shown but not counted in the governance score, because nothing yet ties this listing to Salesforce beyond only the vendor name is known. A vendor-domain page, marketplace listing, ARD manifest or A2A card would confirm it.

Evidence available — not a safety certification. Suitability depends on your task, deployment and permissions. Rows marked vendor-level describe Salesforce, not this agent specifically.

Traces — under attack, in defence, in incidents

1 public · what a trace is
⚠
attacked by a researcher
T3 vendor report · platform-level · unreviewed
Instructions placed in a Web-to-Lead form field are later processed by an Agentforce agent, which queries lead records and sends them to an expired, re-registered Salesforce-allowlisted domain
Observed: Lead data exfiltrated; Salesforce enforced Trusted URL allowlists for Agentforce and Einstein AI and re-secured the expired domain · egress: yes · human approval: no · refused: no
Vendor response: Salesforce patch (Trusted URLs enforcement), September 2025
Noma Security; reported by The Hacker News
2025-09-25

● third-party or vendor report · ◎ this registry's own probe transcript · ⚠ data left the environment. A trace describes one version on one date; it is evidence of behaviour, never a certification. Rows marked unreviewed have not yet been checked against their source by the maintainer.

CVEs — on the official record

3 linked · the registry
CVE-2025-64320
2025-11-04
Improper Neutralization of Input Used for LLM Prompting vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Code Injection.This issue affects Agentforce Vibes Extension:…
Prompt injection · Code execution · fix known · unreviewed
Medium 6.5
CVE-2025-64321
2025-11-04
Improper Neutralization of Input Used for LLM Prompting vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files.This issue affects…
Prompt injection · Code execution · fix known · unreviewed
Medium 5.3
CVE-2025-64322
2025-11-04
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files.This issue affects A…
— · fix known · unreviewed
Medium 5.3

All 3 in the registry → Severity is the official record's; nothing here enters the score. Links are by listed product, so a CVE that names a different component of the same platform may be missing.

Compliance evidence

Jurisdiction: US + EU · 10 frameworks shown
✔
FedRAMP · FedRAMP Moderate
T1 Registry-matched
FedRAMP Authorized
Scope: product · covers this resource: partial · FedRAMP Marketplace · 2026-10-26 · match 91%
re-check 2026-11-02
–
SOC 2
T5 Unknown
Nothing found in the sources checked.
Scope: — · registries, marketplaces, vendor pages
ask the vendor
–
ISO 27001
T5 Unknown
Nothing found in the sources checked.
Scope: — · registries, marketplaces, vendor pages
ask the vendor
–
PCI DSS
T5 Unknown
Nothing found in the sources checked.
Scope: — · registries, marketplaces, vendor pages
ask the vendor

"Unknown" means nothing was found in the sources checked — registries, marketplaces and the vendor's own pages. It is not a finding of non-compliance; ask the vendor.

About the vendor — inherited, not agent-specific

6 records matched at organisation level
✔
CSA STAR · STAR for AI
T1 Registry-matched · vendor-level
found in CSA STAR Registry on 2026-10-26
Scope: entity · CSA STAR Registry · 2026-10-26
re-check 2026-11-02
✔
CSA STAR · STAR Level 1
T1 Registry-matched · vendor-level
found in CSA STAR Registry on 2026-10-26
Scope: entity · CSA STAR Registry · 2026-10-26
re-check 2026-11-02
✔
ISO 42001 · ISO 42001
T1 Registry-matched · vendor-level
Found in CSA STAR Registry on 2026-10-26
Scope: entity · CSA STAR Registry · 2026-10-26
re-check 2026-11-02
○
EU AI Act · Art. 50 statement
T4 Vendor-claimed · vendor-level
Art. 50 statement
Scope: entity · vendor page · 2026-10-26
re-check 2026-11-02
○
GDPR · DPA available
T4 Vendor-claimed · vendor-level
Vendor-claimed
Scope: entity · vendor page · 2026-10-26
re-check 2026-11-02
○
GDPR · DPF active
T4 Vendor-claimed · vendor-level
Vendor-claimed
Scope: entity · vendor page · 2026-10-26
re-check 2026-11-02

A vendor-level registry entry proves the organisation was assessed; whether this agent is inside that scope is a question for the vendor. These rows do not count toward the agent's evidence tier.

✔ found · ○ claimed · – not found · ⚠ expired, stale or revoked. Every row links to its source.Dispute or correct this dossier

GDPR, assembled from checks

GDPR● 0 found in registries or documents○ 2 vendor-claimed⚠ 0 issues linkedas of 2026-10-26
○ ClaimedDPA available: Vendor-claimed (vendor page, 2026-10-26). A DPA is a contract you still have to sign and review.
○ ClaimedDPF active: Vendor-claimed (vendor page, 2026-10-26). Proves a transfer mechanism for EU-to-US transfers only.
– Not foundNo Article 42 GDPR seal. "GDPR certified" is never shown without one.
☐ You checkYour lawful basis, DPIA, and whether this agent is inside the certificate scope.

News and chatter

last 90 days · linked with confidence ≥ 0.85

Nothing linked from Hacker News, GDELT, GitHub releases or the vendor's feed in the last 90 days.

Headline, link and a summary attributed to the outlet. News never changes trust or domain scores.

Finance & Banking score

63
regulated profile · sar-score-2.0 · #1 of 100 in the curated list
Adoption / usage26 / 30
Trust & security11 / 25
Project / product health20 / 20
Ecosystem / interoperability15 / 15
Domain expertise / fit72 / 100
Governance / compliance evidence0 / 100
Docs / transparency10 / 10

Raw component / maximum, then weighted by the regulated profile (adoption 15, trust 25, project 10, ecosystem 10, domain 20, governance 15, docs 5). Trust and governance are computed from the evidence on this page (vendor-level rows at half credit); the other components come from the curated workbook, whose order is the rank. Unknown components count as 0 and are never imputed.

Before you deploy

Derived from the evidence ledger. This agent is not yet in the reference set, so deployment questions (credentials, approval, data handling) are not answered here — ask the vendor.

Evidence supporting this use (7)
CSA STAR STAR for AI — registry-matched, vendor-level source
CSA STAR STAR Level 1 — registry-matched, vendor-level source
FedRAMP Moderate — registry-matched source
ISO 42001 — registry-matched, vendor-level source
EU AI Act Art. 50 statement — vendor-claimed, vendor-level source
GDPR DPA available — vendor-claimed, vendor-level source
GDPR DPF active — vendor-claimed, vendor-level source
Unknowns to check (6)
Your lawful basis and DPIA for PHI and personal data the agent will touch
Current FedRAMP status with the agency, if government use is intended
Whether the CSA STAR entry covers this product; Level 1 is a self-assessment, Level 2 a third-party attestation
The transfer mechanism you will rely on; DPF covers EU-to-US transfers only
That Salesforce actually publishes this agent: nothing beyond the name ties the two together
Ask the vendor for SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS evidence; none was found in the sources checked
Suggested restrictions for a pilot (3)
Confirm the publisher before procurement: nothing found ties this agent to the vendor — no vendor-domain page, marketplace listing or ARD/A2A card.
Ask for the SOC 2 report under NDA before the pilot touches customer data; none was found in the sources checked.
A public trace shows data leaving the environment under adversarial input. Confirm the vendor's fix is in the version you deploy, and keep an egress allowlist around the agent during the pilot.

Rules: config/deploy_rules.json. Advice for a bounded pilot, not a verdict.

Provenance

seed workbookscores, rank, category
CSA STAR Registrycompliance evidence
FedRAMP Marketplacecompliance evidence
vendor pageclaims
NVDsecurity (CVE keyword search)
Hacker News, GDELT, vendor feedsnews and chatter
First seen2026-10-26
Recordres_4920fae88604fbf7
Open the full record (JSON) →

Appears in the incident registry

Public traces of this agent (or its platform) attacking or defending a system.

TR-2026-001 ForcedLeak: a poisoned Web-to-Lead form turns Salesforce Agentforce into a data-exfiltration channel TA0001 · TA0005 · TA0009 · TA0010