Technology & Software Engineering Top 100 / #–ARD = Agentic Resource Discovery · A2A = Agent2Agent · MCP = Model Context Protocol

Open-source project · MIT · self-hosted

autoclip

AutoClip｜一个链接，一键出片。开源 AI 视频剪辑桌面工具，将播客、访谈、课程等长视频自动剪成短视频，生成字幕、封面和发布文案，适配抖音、小红书、TikTok、Reels 与 YouTube Shorts。Open-source AI video clipping & content repurposing. Publisher: zhouxiaoka.

Vendor page ↗+ CompareExport JSON

Trust profileas of 2026-10-26

Publisherlikely · Repository ownership or inferred publisher domain — repository or Hub account ownershiplikely

Complianceno evidence foundT5

SecurityNo CVE linked to this agent in the CVE registry — none linked in the products checked, not a findingnone

ProtocolsModel Context Protocol (MCP) claimed — named in the resource's own tags; no endpoint at the publisher's well-known paths sourceAgent2Agent (A2A) probed, not foundAgentic Resource Discovery (ARD) probed, not found1 / 3

TracesNone found — nobody has published what this agent does under attacknone

Issues found0 regulator actions · 0 incidents · 0 withdrawn certificates · CVEs: see Securitylinks only

Evidence available — not a safety certification. Suitability depends on your task, deployment and permissions. Rows marked vendor-level describe zhouxiaoka, not this agent specifically.

Traces — under attack, in defence, in incidents

none public · what a trace is

No public trace found. Nobody has published what autoclip does when its inputs carry instructions it should not follow, when a tool asks for credentials, or when a task invites a destructive command. Defenders can't learn from what they can't see: run it in a sandbox before the pilot and keep the transcript, or ask the vendor to publish one.

● third-party or vendor report · ◎ this registry's own probe transcript · ⚠ data left the environment. A trace describes one version on one date; it is evidence of behaviour, never a certification. Rows marked unreviewed have not yet been checked against their source by the maintainer.

CVEs — on the official record

none linked · the registry

No CVE in the registry names this agent or its listed product. That reads "none linked in the products checked", never as a finding: a product that is not on the registry's list, or a record that names it differently, is not seen. The vendor's own advisories remain the source of truth.

Compliance evidence

4 frameworks shown

–

SOC 2

T5 Unknown

Nothing found in the sources checked.

Scope: — · registries, marketplaces, vendor pages

ask the vendor

–

ISO 27001

T5 Unknown

Nothing found in the sources checked.

Scope: — · registries, marketplaces, vendor pages

ask the vendor

–

ISO 42001

T5 Unknown

Nothing found in the sources checked.

Scope: — · registries, marketplaces, vendor pages

ask the vendor

–

CSA STAR

T5 Unknown

Nothing found in the sources checked.

Scope: — · CSA STAR Registry

ask the vendor

"Unknown" means nothing was found in the sources checked — registries, marketplaces and the vendor's own pages. It is not a finding of non-compliance; ask the vendor.

✔ found · ○ claimed · – not found · ⚠ expired, stale or revoked. Every row links to its source.Dispute or correct this dossier

GDPR, assembled from checks

GDPR● 0 found in registries or documents○ 0 vendor-claimed⚠ 0 issues linkedas of 2026-10-26

– Not foundNo Article 42 GDPR seal. "GDPR certified" is never shown without one.

☐ You checkYour lawful basis, DPIA, and whether this agent is inside the certificate scope.

News and chatter

last 90 days · linked with confidence ≥ 0.85

2026-10-24

AutoClip Desktop v1.5.7

GitHub releases · ## AutoClip Desktop v1.5.7 这一版主要让出片更稳，字幕更好看，第一次上手更顺。 This release makes clip generation more reliable, fixes caption display, and smooths out first-time setup. ### 更新了什么 **字幕与风格更好看** - 长句子不会再被裁掉，会自动分成几屏依次显示；字幕跟着画面一句一句换。 - 制作页可以直接打开或关闭字幕

Product update

2026-10-09

AutoClip Desktop v1.5.6

GitHub releases · ## AutoClip Desktop v1.5.6 - 默认自动预检失败时改走字幕路线继续出片，不再整单失败；只有明确要求视觉分析时才停住。 - 导入前检查分析模型、转写、视觉和 FFmpeg。缺什么直接给出连接、安装或打开设置的入口；没有字幕且转写未就绪时不能开始。 - 自动出片失败事件补齐失败阶段、HTTP 状态和字幕/视觉路线，不再把所有失败都记成笼统的模型错误。 - 安装冒烟改为走 Studio 一键出片，并用 ffprobe 检查成片。 - 桌面版不再启

Product update

Headline, link and a summary attributed to the outlet. News never changes trust or domain scores.

Technology & Software Engineering score

technology profile · sar-score-2.0 · unranked

Adoption / usage23 / 30

Trust & security17 / 25

Project / product health20 / 20

Ecosystem / interoperability7 / 15

Domain expertise / fit56 / 100

Governance / compliance evidenceunknown

Docs / transparency7 / 10

Raw component / maximum, then weighted by the technology profile (adoption 30, trust 20, project 20, ecosystem 15, domain 10, governance 0, docs 5). Trust and governance are computed from the evidence on this page (vendor-level rows at half credit); the other components come from the curated workbook, whose order is the rank. Unknown components count as 0 and are never imputed.

Before you deploy

Derived from the evidence ledger. This agent is not yet in the reference set, so deployment questions (credentials, approval, data handling) are not answered here — ask the vendor.

Evidence supporting this use (0)

Nothing found in the sources checked.

Unknowns to check (1)

Ask the vendor for SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, CSA STAR evidence; none was found in the sources checked

Suggested restrictions for a pilot (2)

Ask for the SOC 2 report under NDA before the pilot touches customer data; none was found in the sources checked.

No public trace of this agent under adversarial input was found. Run it in a sandbox against your own prompt-injection and tool-abuse scenarios before the pilot, and keep the transcript; the enterprise edition records one.

Rules: config/deploy_rules.json. Advice for a bounded pilot, not a verdict.

Provenance

GitHubrepository signals, license

NVDsecurity (CVE keyword search)

Hacker News, GDELT, vendor feedsnews and chatter

First seen2026-10-26

Recordres_53a7a5fd9e09b46a

Open the full record (JSON) →